Skip to content
← Projects

Project Detail

CHT: Electronics Enclosure Cooling Optimisation

8-case SolidWorks Flow Simulation conjugate heat transfer study: fan placement, heat sink design, and airflow routing to cool a 25 W main chip and 10 W power block below 85 °C.

SolidWorks Flow SimulationCHTElectronics CoolingForced ConvectionHeat SinkParametric StudyThermal Management
CHT: Electronics Enclosure Cooling Optimisation

Key outcomes

8

Design cases, fan position, venting, heat sink geometry

61 °C

Main chip, final design at 25 W full load

60 °C

Power block, final design. Both below 85 °C target

Simulation setup

Internal forced convection with conjugate heat transfer, solid conduction and fluid convection solved together. All cases share the same boundary conditions; only fan placement, venting, and heat sink geometry change. All cases are run at basic mesh settings for quick evaluation.

Fluid

Air at 25 °C ambient, 101 325 Pa. Outer walls: 5 W/m²·K convection to ambient.

Heat loads

Cases 01-04: 10 W chip / 5 W power block. Cases 04B-08: 25 W chip / 10 W power block (full design load). Target: both below 85 °C.

Fan

Sunon GM0535PFV1-8 (35 mm class) from the SolidWorks fan database. Fan curve applied, not a fixed flow rate.

Heat sink (initial)

Solid Al 6061 block on the main chip for Cases 01-06. Cases 07-08: finned Al heat sink, 50 × 50 mm base, 40 mm tall, 14 fins at 1 mm thick, 3.3 mm gaps.

Goals tracked

Max surface temperature on main chip and power block. Volume-averaged temperatures. Heat flow budget at enclosure walls.

Post-processing

Temperature cut plots, flow trajectories, fluid temperature, velocity cuts, surface temperature maps.

Case matrix

Each case changes one variable. Cases 01-04 ran at 10 W / 5 W to validate fan approach. Full 25 W / 10 W design load applied from Case 04B onward.

CaseConfigurationLoadChip (°C)Power Block (°C)Outcome
01External inlet fan, baseline10 W / 5 W57.3948.95Reference
02External inlet fan + reducer shroud10 W / 5 W48.3351.11Good chip cooling, packaging tradeoff
03External outlet fan10 W / 5 W118.7875.14Rejected, chip over limit
04Internal fan10 W / 5 W50.8741.72Selected fan approach
04BInternal fan, full design load25 W / 10 W99.8065.15Over limit, heat sink upgrade needed
05Internal fan + upper vent25 W / 10 W84.3755.25Thermally OK, rejected, dust risk
06Internal fan + rear exhaust fan25 W / 10 W95.4058.48Rejected, worsened chip cooling
07Internal fan + optimised Al heat sink25 W / 10 W50.8984.10Chip fixed, power block now limiting
08Optimised HS + cross-flow inlet fan25 W / 10 W61.0759.96Final design, both targets met
Case 01 · 10 W / 5 W

External inlet fan, baseline

Fan blows air directly into the enclosure from the front. Chip reaches 57.4 °C, power block 49.0 °C, both well within limit at 10 W load. Establishes the reference geometry and result for all comparisons.

Case 01, baseline geometry with external inlet fan

Baseline geometry, external inlet fan

Case 01, temperature cut showing chip at 57.4°C

Temperature cut, chip 57.4 °C, power block 49.0 °C

Case 01, flow trajectories showing airflow through enclosure

Flow trajectories, inlet fan drives air over components

Case 02 · 10 W / 5 W

Inlet fan + reducer shroud

A reducer shroud concentrates inlet airflow directly onto the chip heat sink. The chip improves to 48.3 °C, but the power block rises to 51.1 °C as the shroud restricts flow reaching that region. Packaging cost is also higher. Rejected as the primary path, the tradeoff between components is the wrong direction.

Case 02, reducer shroud geometry

Reducer shroud concentrates inlet flow

Case 02, temperature cut with shroud: chip 48.3°C, power block 51.1°C

Temperature cut, chip 48.3 °C, power block rises to 51.1 °C

Case 02, flow trajectories showing concentrated airflow with shroud

Flow trajectories, shroud channels air to heat sink, bypasses power block

Case 03 · Rejected · 10 W / 5 W

External outlet fan

Fan pulls air out of the enclosure instead of pushing it in. The chip reaches 118.8 °C, 34 °C above the limit at only half the design load. Hot exhaust recirculates over the chip before it can exit. Immediately rejected.

Case 03, external outlet fan geometry

Outlet fan geometry

Case 03, temperature cut showing chip at 118.8°C

Temperature cut, chip 118.8 °C (34 °C over limit at 10 W)

Case 03, flow trajectories showing hot air recirculation with outlet fan

Flow trajectories, hot air recirculates over chip before exiting

Key insight

Outlet vs. inlet: a 61 °C difference at the chip at the same power level. Fan direction determines whether cool air reaches the heat source before it absorbs heat from the rest of the enclosure.

Case 04 · 10 W / 5 W

Internal fan

Fan moved inside the enclosure. Chip drops to 50.9 °C and power block to 41.7 °C, the best combined result so far. Internal placement confirmed as the correct direction. The fan approach is selected; attention now shifts to whether it holds at full 25 W load.

Case 04, temperature cut with internal fan: chip 50.9°C, power block 41.7°C

Temperature cut, chip 50.9 °C, power block 41.7 °C

Case 04, chip and heat sink surface temperatures

Chip and heat sink surface temperatures

Case 04, flow trajectories showing clean airflow over both components

Flow trajectories, internal fan drives clean air over chip and power block

Case 04B · Stress test · 25 W / 10 W

Internal fan at full design load

Same internal fan configuration as Case 04 but at the real design load: 25 W chip / 10 W power block. The chip rises to 99.8 °C, over the 85 °C limit. The fan placement is correct; the solid Al block heat sink is insufficient at full load. A finned heat sink is needed.

Case 04, fluid temperature showing thermal field reference for stress comparison

Fluid temperature field, at 25 W the solid block heat sink cannot keep pace (chip 99.8 °C)

Case 05 · Rejected · 25 W / 10 W

Internal fan + upper vent

An upper vent is opened to allow hot air to escape directly. The chip drops to 84.4 °C, just within the 85 °C target. However, the open aperture creates an uncontrolled dust ingress path. Rejected despite meeting the thermal target.

Case 05, temperature cut with upper vent: chip 84.4°C

Temperature cut, chip 84.4 °C (meets limit but only just)

Case 05, flow trajectories showing hot air escaping through upper vent

Flow trajectories, hot air exits through upper vent, but vent is open to dust

Case 06 · Rejected · 25 W / 10 W

Internal fan + rear exhaust fan

A rear exhaust fan is added alongside the internal fan to increase total airflow. The chip worsens to 95.4 °C, worse than Case 04B with no second fan. The rear exhaust fan pulls air away from the heat sink before it can absorb heat from the chip. More fans, worse result.

Case 06, temperature cut showing chip worsened to 95.4°C with rear exhaust fan

Temperature cut, chip 95.4 °C (worse than 04B despite added fan)

Case 06, flow trajectories showing airflow diverted from chip by rear exhaust

Flow trajectories, rear fan pulls flow away before it reaches the chip heat sink

Finding

More fans does not mean more cooling. Airflow routing matters as much as airflow quantity, the rear fan increased total flow but reduced the fraction that reached where it was needed.

Case 07 · 25 W / 10 W

Optimised aluminium heat sink

The solid Al block is replaced with a finned heat sink: 50 × 50 mm base, 40 mm tall, 14 fins at 1 mm thick with 3.3 mm gaps. The chip drops to 50.9 °C. But the power block rises to 84.1 °C, right at the limit. The finned heat sink draws more airflow to the chip region, leaving less for the power block. Chip is no longer the bottleneck.

Case 07, temperature cut: chip 50.9°C, power block 84.1°C

Temperature cut, chip 50.9 °C, power block 84.1 °C (at limit)

Case 07, velocity cut showing high airflow through heat sink fins

Velocity cut, high-speed airflow through fins, less reaching power block

Case 07, flow trajectories showing flow concentration around heat sink

Flow trajectories, fins pull flow; power block region is under-served

Case 08, Final design · 25 W / 10 W

Cross-flow inlet fan, both targets met

A side-mounted cross-flow external inlet fan is added to deliver fresh air directly to the power block region. The internal fan and finned heat sink continue to manage the chip independently. Both components meet the 85 °C target with clear margin: chip 61.1 °C, power block 60.0 °C.

Case 08, final geometry with optimised heat sink and cross-flow inlet fan

Final geometry, optimised heat sink + cross-flow inlet fan

Case 08, temperature cut: chip 61.1°C, power block 60.0°C

Temperature cut, chip 61.1 °C, power block 60.0 °C

Case 08, fluid temperature distribution showing balanced cooling

Fluid temperature, balanced thermal distribution across enclosure

Case 08, velocity cut showing dual fan airflow distribution

Velocity cut, dual fan airflow covering both thermal zones

Case 08, flow trajectories showing cross-flow fan delivering air to power block

Flow trajectories, cross-flow fan delivers fresh air directly to power block region

What this study showed

The right answer wasn’t more airflow, it was airflow reaching the right place. Fan direction (Cases 03 vs 04), fan count (Case 06), and where the heat sink concentrates flow (Case 07) all shaped the outcome more than total flow rate. The 8-case progression gave a defensible, evidence-backed path to both components under target.

Future optimisations

Where this study could go next

Case 08 meets the 85 °C target. The table below captures the most impactful next steps if power density increases or design constraints tighten.

OptimisationTargetsNote
Higher static pressure fanAir-side convection through the heat sinkImproves flow through fin channels without adding passive dust-prone vents
Dedicated power block heat sinkPower block local heat rejectionReduces dependence on airflow alone for the secondary hot component
Heat pipe to remote fin stackHeat spreading and remote heat rejectionMoves chip heat to a region with better available airflow or more fin volume
Vapour chamber or copper spreaderChip heat spreadingReduces local hot spots before heat enters the fin stack
Filtered intake and controlled exhaust pathDust-controlled airflowAllows more airflow without uncontrolled open slots
Push-pull fan architectureSystem through-flowCan increase pressure capability if the flow path is well controlled
TEC feasibility studySub-ambient or precise temperature controlOnly useful if hot-side heat rejection is upgraded; otherwise it adds heat to the system